Trump-Fueled Corruption Is Overtaking A Whole Government Branch

By: Alec Donaldson | Last updated: Sep 27, 2023

It has come to light, as anticipated after years of involvement with right-wing causes funded by America’s elite, that Ginny Thomas, the wife of Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, was deeply engaged in Trump’s January 6th “rally.”

This revelation begs a straightforward statement: the U.S. Supreme Court is tainted by corruption, a sentiment shared by a growing number of Americans.

The Supreme Court's Behaviors

In a way unprecedented in any other federal court, the Supreme Court has exhibited dubious behavior. Imagine any other court allowing a defendant to whisk a judge on a private luxury jet to a lavish hunting retreat, only to have that judge rule in favor of that defendant a week later.

Advertisement

Source: Corbis Images

Yet, this transpired when former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia did so during Dick Cheney’s lawsuit, involving his alleged deception about a secretive “energy group” planning Iraq’s oil field takeover, a catalyst for the war’s aftermath.

Favoring The Group

Similarly, no other court would tolerate a judge offering a speech to a group that funds a case before them – only to subsequently favor that group’s objectives.

Advertisement

Source: Erin Schaff-Pool/Getty Images

However, Neal Gorsuch did exactly that when addressing the Fund for American Studies, backed by the Bradley Foundation, which contributed to the Janus v AFSCME case eroding union protections for government workers.

Brett Kavanaugh

Nor would any court accept a judge vowing retribution against a specific nonprofit corporation (like the Democratic Party) during confirmation hearings and then rendering verdicts on related cases, such as voting rights.

Advertisement

Source: Doug Mills-Pool/Getty Images

Yet, Brett Kavanaugh exhibited this behavior.

It's Happened Many Times Before

Other courts would consider it illegal for a judge to preside over a case in which they held significant stock in the company presenting arguments, yet this happened with John Roberts and others in the Supreme Court.

Advertisement

Source: Robert Alexander/Getty Images

Clarence Thomas and his wife, recently profiled in a revealing New York Times piece, even allowed his wife to advocate for litigants before the Court while accepting substantial sums from groups engaged in Court cases.

The EPA

Moreover, the Court has undermined the EPA, using Justice Gorsuch’s textualist arguments to weaken the agency, ironically headed by Gorsuch’s mother that faced scandal during the Reagan administration.

Source: Twitter

These Republican-appointed judges reject Democratic attempts to combat gerrymandering while endorsing GOP initiatives to enforce it.

Advertisement

Article III

Can we, paraphrasing Shakespeare, rid ourselves of this Court’s corruption? Surprisingly, Congress holds that power, stipulated by Article III of the Constitution.

Source: archives.gov

This article empowers Congress to establish federal courts and mandates that Supreme Court judges adhere to good behavior.

Advertisement

Ethical Rules For Federal Judges

Since 1921, when Chief Justice William Howard Taft chaired the first commission to develop ethical rules for federal judges, attempts have been made to regulate the Court’s conduct.

Source: MPI/Getty Images

The 1923 Canons of Judicial Ethics and the subsequent 1972 Code of Judicial Conduct aimed to guide judges’ behavior, but the Supreme Court, increasingly self-empowered, sidestepped these measures.

Advertisement

The Court Answers To Itself

Even in 2011, Chief Justice John Roberts acknowledged Taft’s work while disregarding his call for the Supreme Court’s adherence. Roberts asserted that the Court answers only to itself.

Source: Brooks Kraft LLC/Corbis via Getty Images

Efforts to restore accountability abound: legislative proposals have been presented, but they’ve faced resistance. President Biden’s commission urged an advisory code of conduct for the Court, but Roberts remained silent. Senator Chris Murphy’s Supreme Court Ethics Act aimed at reigning in the Court’s partisanship but was blocked.

Advertisement

Congress Needs To Act Fast

As public dissatisfaction grows, with the Court’s approval rating hitting a record low, it’s time for Congress to act. The Court’s adoption of the federal code of judicial ethics and even expansion should be considered.

Source: Gizmodo

Otherwise, this branch of government risks sinking into irredeemable corruption.

Advertisement